Search for: "Plaintiff 1 et al v. Wells et al"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 1,704
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2022, 1:35 pm
The unadjusted hazard ratio was 1.15 (0.91 – 1.44), p = 0.2493.[5] Given the 15 trial end points, an adjusted p-value for this particular hazard ratio, for diabetes, might well exceed 0.5, and even approach 1.0. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 3:36 pm
Bank of America: action for unspecified breach relating to plaintiff's iPod playlist; $1 trillion demanded Feeney v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:34 pm
Burst is yet another case in which plaintiff claimed that exposure to gasoline caused acute myeloid leukemia (AML), one of several different types of leukemia[1]. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
That is one side of the argument made in Dynamo Holdings Limited Partnership, et al, Petitioner vs the Commissioner of Internal Revenue; Beekman Vista, Inc vs the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Docket Nos. 2685-11, 8393-12). [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 12:09 pm
Noom Inc., et al. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:45 am
[1] Mayo Collaborative Services, DBA Mayo Medical Laboratories, et al. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm
Canada On 6 February 2023, Smith J dismissed the defendant’s application to dismiss the plaintiff’s claim under an anti-SLAPP provision in the case of Kirkland v Nagy et al, 2023 ONSC 871. [read post]
15 May 2023, 11:09 am
Friends of Oceano Dunes, et al. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 8:40 am
The recent judgment of the CJEU in Case C‑616/10, Solvay SA v Honeywell et al. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am
Malayasia Int’l Shipping,[1] the Supreme Court offered a new synthesis of the federal doctrine of forum non conveniens. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am
Malayasia Int’l Shipping,[1] the Supreme Court offered a new synthesis of the federal doctrine of forum non conveniens. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
28 USC 1442(a)(1) permits removal to federal court of a criminal prosecution (or civil action) against defendants “for or relating to any act under color of such office. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
At the original trial the jury awarded $520,000 compensation for the appropriated land, as well as $300,000 for damages to the residue after the appropriation. 1 125 U.S. 2655 (2005). 2 2005 Ohio 6469; 2005 Ohio App. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 12:13 pm
The Episcopal Church, et al., as I wrote in this post. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 10:17 am
Jian Lu et al. that includes actual damages/lost profits and attorneys’ fees and costs. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
” 42 C.F.R. 430.12(c)(1)(i). [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm
In 2015, for instance, she spoke at a rally opposing California's new strict school vaccination bill, and was later quoted in the Sacramento Bee (David Siders et al.): When she heard at the vigil that Brown had signed the bill, Kimberly McCauley of Sacramento sat down on the steps and cried. [read post]
15 May 2008, 9:58 am
" Michelle & Edward Rau, et al v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
