Search for: "STONE v. CASE" Results 1441 - 1460 of 2,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2012, 5:27 am by S
He contended that the reviewing officer’s decision was unlawful because European jurisprudence required her to consider, when considering if he was temporarily unable to work, whether there was any chance of Mr Samin returning to work.Unfortunately for Mr Samin, by the time the appeal was heard the Court of Appeal had already considered the question in two other appeals, namely De Brito v SSHD [2012] EWCA Civ 709 and Konodyba v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea [2012]… [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 5:27 am by S
He contended that the reviewing officer’s decision was unlawful because European jurisprudence required her to consider, when considering if he was temporarily unable to work, whether there was any chance of Mr Samin returning to work.Unfortunately for Mr Samin, by the time the appeal was heard the Court of Appeal had already considered the question in two other appeals, namely De Brito v SSHD [2012] EWCA Civ 709 and Konodyba v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea [2012]… [read post]
8 May 2009, 5:38 am
" The case leaves no stone unturned, challenging not only Proposition 8, but bans against same sex marriage in other states, and the so called 'Defense of Marriage Act' (DOMA) that was passed by Congress. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 9:40 pm by Gordon Firemark
  Supreme Court Denies NCAA Motion to Intervene in First Amendment Case Keller v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
Stone, et al., Constitutional Law (Aspen Law & Business, 4th ed., 2001): 331-419. [read post]