Search for: "Speed v. State" Results 1441 - 1460 of 4,299
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2024, 12:50 am by Tristan Marot
” Mthethwa v MiWay Insurance Limited (84333/2017) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1095 (16 October 2024) [read post]
1 May 2019, 5:00 am by Jason C. Gavejian and Maya Atrakchi
By granting the petition for certiorari, the Court afforded itself the opportunity to clarify its 2010 decision in Stolt-Nielsen v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:05 am by John-Paul Boyd, QC
” In Weir v Weir, (1986) 1 RFL (3d) 438 (BCSC), the court held that dependence arising from a “poor job market” qualified adult children for support, a conclusion that was expanded in Bruehler v Bruehler, (1985) 49 RFL (2d) 44 (BCCA) to include “a state of [economic] depression in a province. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:18 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Troy District Judge Kirsten Nielsen Hartig has ruled that Michigan's motor vehicle code provision criminalizing the operation of a motor vehicle with the presence of a controlled substance [marijuana] violates the equal protection clause of the Michigan and United States Constitutions.The case, People v Sulaka, arose in 2010 when the accused was allegedly speeding and, when pulled-over, could not produce a drivers license. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 6:52 am by Kali Borkoski
”   James Mets – The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Florence v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 3:53 pm by Amy Howe
In November, the justices heard United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 11:47 am by CJLF Staff
  Matt Bittle of the Delaware State News reports that in Rauf v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
This is a recap post written by the very same Merpel, who intends to bring new readers up to speed, as well as to assist regular readers who may have skipped past those posts and who want a synopsis of what exactly is rotten in the state of Eponia.* Not the only regional ogre: does EPO have a soul-mate in OAPI? [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 4:38 am by Sean Wajert
Plaintiff filed this wrongful death action and claimed that decedent drove a 2005 Toyota Camry at a speed of less than 25 miles per hour when the vehicle suddenly accelerated to a speed in excess of 80 miles per hour. [read post]