Search for: "State of New Jersey v. United States"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 3,526
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2016, 12:04 pm
A–0009–12T4, 2013 WL 5447716, at *3 (New Jersey SuperiorCourt – Appellate Division Oct. 2, 2013); State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm
Degradation of news values. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 12:28 am
We were counsel in a case that went before the New Jersey Supreme Court in 2008, State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 6:40 am
State v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 2:34 pm
LG Electronics; and that the sale outside of the United States of an article covered by a US patent does not exhaust the rights of the patent holder as against the purchaser of that article on the purchaser’s importation of that article into the United States, notwithstanding the 2013 copyright decision of the Supreme Court in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 1:35 pm
From the decisionHigh Point SARL (“High Point”) appeals the final judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey holding that its patent rights were exhausted by the authorized sales of telecommunications infrastructure equipment substantially embodying the asserted claims of U.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:59 am
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), Justice Scalia applied the rule first formulated in Katz v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:46 am
Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:40 am
Medical expenses can be deducted in the inheritance tax.Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 6:06 am
In 2012, a divided United States Supreme Court ruled in Miller v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 5:19 am
New Jersey (which he engineered) and Blakely v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:38 pm
Scalia's majority opinion was very useful in the ultimate habeas corpus petition filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.Another example of Scalia's handiwork in the realm of the constitutional rights of the accused is his dissent in the 2000 case of Apprendi v New Jersey, which ripened into a majority opinion 4-years later in Blakely v Washington, holding that a judge cannot fashion a sentence… [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 4:46 pm
This is an appeal from an amended opinion and order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, dismissing at the pleadings stage all federal claims against the defendants on qualified immunity grounds because the plaintiffs had not adequately alleged that their constitutional rights were violated, and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 10:33 am
As to the husband’s First Amendment arguments, the Court referred to the three prong test under the United States Supreme Court case of Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:46 am
United States expressly repudiated the rationale of the Olmstead (majority) decision. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:10 am
For more on the remaining stun-gun bans throughout the United States, see my 2009 article; the Michigan and Wisconsin bans have been repealed, but the bans in Hawaii, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, the District, the Virgin Islands and several cities still remain. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:40 pm
Earlier this month, the New Jersey Appellate Division took up the issue of whether or not a litigant living as a fugitive outside the United States has standing to challenge a default judgment entered by the trial relating to custody and support. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 12:42 pm
Heffernan, a police officer for the Town of Paterson, New Jersey, was asked by his bedridden mother to pick up a campaign sign for her to put on her lawn. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 7:12 am
New Jersey Property-Liability Guarantee Assn. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 6:00 am
Friedman LLC represents defendants on appeals to the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court, and to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. [read post]
