Search for: "State v. E. F."
Results 1441 - 1460
of 8,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 8:59 pm
The plaintiff appealed.On appeal, the plaintiff argued that § 1681t(b)(1)(F) conflicts with 1681h(e) because, according to the plaintiff, 1681h(e) specifically authorizes certain state law claims while §1681t(b)(1)(F) preempts them. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 2:27 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 1:13 pm
The Sixth Circuit agreed this week to publish United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 11:00 am
§2031.240 (pdf) in which it is expected that for each document withheld on the claim of privilege that the privilege log state (a) the nature of the document (e.g., letter, memorandum, (b) date, (c) author, (d) recipients, (e) the sequential number (or document control number, if any), and (f) the privilege claimed? [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:01 am
by Renée Kolar Since its inception, the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) has won 58 out of 60 arbitrations against athletes who have contested the agency’s sanctions. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 12:24 pm
Appellees and intervenors Howard F. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 11:03 am
In Thompson v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 2:21 pm
He highlighted how, not only is the DMCA "more broken than ever", but also how the original intention of Congress has been defeated by the actual application of the law by courts (in Perfect 10 v CCBill, Viacom v YouTube, UMG v Shelter, and Capitol v Vimeo): instead of having service providers and copyright owners working together to prevent online piracy, the DMCA has turned into a notice-and-takedown regime where copyright owners have to do most - if… [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 1:20 pm
§ 1052(f). [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 3:55 am
If the proceeding is instituted, the requestor has no further involvement, the matter proceeds on an ex parte basis (15 U.S.C.1066a(d); 1066b(e)), and the registrant may rebut the prima facie case of nonuse (15 U.S.C. 1066a(e), (f); 1066b(f)). [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:34 pm
Org. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 3:55 am
Citibank, N.A., 782 F.2d 1106, 1115 (2d Cir. 1986) and Regions Bank v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 9:04 pm
Co. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 4:12 am
In re Martha Maria Sanchez Quiroz, Serial No. 90630537 (August 5, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas V. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
Kalish, 626 F.3d 165 (U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 11:23 am
Case Co. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 12:09 pm
’ ” SD3, 801 F.3d at 436 (quoting DM Research, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 5:00 am
Vilsmeier Auctions Co., 986 F. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm
In the event that extradition is denied on that basis, Article 3(2) requires the Requested State to submit the case to its competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution if the Requesting State so requests and if the laws of the Requested State so allow. [read post]
