Search for: "State v. P. B." Results 1441 - 1460 of 6,784
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
That the voters explicitly imposed a procedural two-thirds vote requirement on themselves in [Article 13 C, Section 2(d)] is evidence that they did not implicitly impose a procedural timing requirement in subdivision (b).8 The court called this quote “ambiguous dictum” at best, and stated “this language appears to imply that the voters imposed the two-thirds voting requirement on themselves only with respect to taxes placed on the ballot by local government (e.g.,… [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:59 pm by Unknown
§ 42-4-1208(3)(b) stated that the owner of private property available for public use “may request” the installation of official signs identifying parking spaces reserved for persons with disabilities. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:58 pm by Jim Martin
  Sixteen years later, in his dissent in Bush v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
More recently, Gregory Shill of the University of Iowa College of Law describes in The Atlantic how the law effectively compels the use of the automobile, repeating the 1977 SCOTUS reference in Wooley v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 11:40 am by skelly
Increasingly, in recent years, states have begun to take a second look at RPGs and how they are utilized in light of each state’s own particular statutes and regulations, and this article serves to examine some of the most consistent misconceptions and mistakes permeating the group P&C insurance space, as well as to explore the ambiguities that state insurance laws sometimes fail to address. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 9:10 am by Schachtman
In the Paoli Railroad yard litigation, plaintiffs claimed injuries and increased risk of future cancers from environmental exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
After last week’s decision in Department of Commerce v. [read post]