Search for: "TAYLOR v. TAYLOR"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 4,359
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2023, 3:27 am
" Great Concepts, LLC v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 3:50 am
"The Appellate Division disagreed, holding that the County was under no contractual obligation to provide [Handy] with health insurance and, accordingly, it did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in terminating that benefit.The Handy decision should be contrasted with two other retiree benefits cases: Della Rocco v City of Schenectady and Andriano v City of Schenectady.The Schenectady cases differed in that they concerned executive action as opposed to legislative action and… [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 2:17 pm
Flynn, Taylor v. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 4:16 pm
Staunton v Kaye & Anor [2010] UKUT 270 (LC) This is a rather confused matter from the Upper Tribunal (Lands) sitting in Manchester. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 4:16 pm
Staunton v Kaye & Anor [2010] UKUT 270 (LC) This is a rather confused matter from the Upper Tribunal (Lands) sitting in Manchester. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 7:45 am
US v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:12 pm
Aug. 17, 2011), we hold, as we explicitly did in Taylor v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 9:09 pm
” Prima Paint Corp. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 12:00 am
Rogers v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
See NLRB v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 7:40 am
In other words, the provisions dealing with disciplinary action set out in the collective bargaining agreement negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law were a nullity.In Town of Wallkill v CSEA, Town of Wallkill Police Department, 19 NY3d 1066, the Court of Appeals said that the discipline of police officers "may not be a subject of collective bargaining under the Taylor Law when the Legislature has expressly committed disciplinary authority over a police department to… [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 12:59 pm
In the landmark 1973 Supreme Court case Frontiero v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
The celebration of two decades of the House of Lords patent biopatent ruling in Biogen v Medeva, hosted by Rouse, is happily recorded on PatLit by Rouseniks Mary Smillie and Catriona Smith. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
See Bart v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 4:00 am
Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 10:45 am
Taylor v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:59 pm
In the recent SCOTUSblog symposium on the upcoming Fisher v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 2:51 pm
Taylor , 53 M.J. 195, 199 (C.A.A.F. 2000). [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 9:27 am
Taylor No. 104402558 Grant Dickinson, Attorney for Appellant Anthony C. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 3:00 am
Taylor, 529 U.S. at 405-07. [read post]
