Search for: "Unit, Inc., Appeal of" Results 1441 - 1460 of 13,888
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2009, 8:47 am
[*Water]Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 1:12 pm by Beth Graham
Today, the United States Supreme Court delivered a unanimous opinion in Henry Schein, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 1:37 am by Brian Craig
Case date: 29 January 2020 Case number: No. 18-51021 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 1:09 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:30 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:44 pm by WIMS
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
20 May 2011, 1:14 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 8:55 am by Beth Graham
In an interesting twist, a three-member arbitration panel will reportedly consider an appeal related to a 2005 arbitration agreement between Lance Armstrong and Dallas-based SCA Promotions, Inc. [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:27 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 1:33 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 1:13 am
It's been a while, but we have our third citing of the Court of Appeals' February 2008 Bi-Economy holding, this time in a Kansas federal court case.In United States Fire Ins. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 2:54 pm by Rebecca Jeschke
Faulty Decision from Ninth Circuit Panel Endangers Free Speech, Historical RecordSan Francisco - The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and a coalition of technology and free speech organizations are asking the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to fix a disastrously wrongheaded copyright ruling that required an online service provider to take offline—and keep offline—a controversial video that has been the center of a global debate. [read post]