Search for: "United States v. Breyer" Results 1441 - 1460 of 3,533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2011, 6:19 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
United States, in which a divided Court held (for the second time) that federal regulations promulgated by the U.S. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
One must not forget that tribal immunity is a creature of the federal courts, and is not expressly recognized by Congress, the United States Constitution, or Indian treaties. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
One must not forget that tribal immunity is a creature of the federal courts, and is not expressly recognized by Congress, the United States Constitution, or Indian treaties. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:20 am by Amy Howe
On Tuesday, the Court dismissed the union organizing case UNITE Here Local 355 v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 8:56 am by Amy Howe
Moath Hamza Ahmed al-Alwi’s lawyers say that he was in Afghanistan when the United States began its bombing campaign there after the September 11 attacks, but quickly fled to Pakistan, where bounty-hunters turned him over to the United States. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 5:47 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
If you don't have a venue statute likeSection 1400, you get the kind of litigation experiencesthat are set out in the amici briefs.The -- the law professor's brief noted thatthere's a single judge in the United States that hasone-quarter of all patent cases in the United States onhis docket. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:21 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 2-3, n. 1. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:37 am by Kali Borkoski
At the Concurring Opinions blog, Gerard Magliocca has a post titled “Interesting Cases You’ve Never Heard of – The Pueblo Indians” in which he discusses the Court’s 1876 opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 10:28 am by Kiera Flynn
In commentary at CNN International, Aaron Carroll weighs in, describing this Term as “a pivotal moment for the Supreme Court, for politics, and for the future of health care reform in the United States. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 11:14 am by Amy Howe
Sotomayor also observed that there has been a long history in the United States of states not wanting to fund churches; they should be free to do that in cases like this. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:11 pm by Lovechilde
"  -- Attorney Cyrus Mehri, quoted by Adam SerwerWhile it is generally agreed that business interests, as Justice Stephen Breyer said last year, "have always done pretty well" before the United States Supreme Court, the current conservative members of the Court have driven a marked ideological shift that favors corporations to a far greater degree. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 6:05 pm
"The United States argued that this provision operates to displace the basic principle that an inventor owns the rights to his invention. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:43 am by Robin Craig
The vision of multiple states suddenly suing each other over groundwater clearly disturbed Breyer. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 10:01 am by Kevin Johnson
  Justices Breyer (who aggressively peppered Curtis Gannon for the United States with questions just seconds after he began his argument), Sotomayor, Ginburg, and Kagan all expressed skepticism about the arguments of the United States. [read post]