Search for: "United States v. Cores"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 3,566
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2013, 1:45 pm
The lawsuit, Hernandez v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 8:34 am
It would be very dangerous to deny relief in this instance”.There were no representatives of either Equustek or the Canadian Supreme Court in attendance, and Judge Edward Davila agreed with Google’s request for a preliminary injunction in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 7:12 am
Uber Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 10:16 am
Ackerman argues further that anti-humiliation is the premise behind United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 6:37 am
Here's the abstract from the paper:The Supreme Court’s pronouncements in Brady v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
The relationship between EU law and the municipal law of the United Kingdom seems to lend itself to allusions to water. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 7:31 am
It is considered one of the core cases defining free speech in the United States. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 2:02 pm
(See United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Drawing from comparative analysis and federal theory, we argue that elements of federal solidarity are readily identifiable in the United States and that conceiving of them as such helps to clarify doctrine, for example, around the dormant commerce clause and interstate sovereign immunity. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 8:59 am
General Rule v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:01 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 8:20 pm
Notes for: --Marbury v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:45 pm
This morning the Supreme Court issued its 6-3 decision (PDF here) in a strange case that many privacy scholars had watched closely, Sorell v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:18 pm
We therefore reverse the grant of summaryjudgment for Sunovion.Of public useAn applicant may not receive a patent for an inventionthat was “in public use . . . in this country, more thanone year prior to the date of the application for patent inthe United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 10:29 am
Chooseco LLC v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:29 am
The decision in R (on the application of Fox) v Secretary of State for Education [2015] EWHC 3404 (Admin) concerned the new subject content issued for GCSE Religious Studies. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:30 am
” Bank of United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:46 am
United States expressly repudiated the rationale of the Olmstead (majority) decision. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:30 pm
The judgement in the case of Beizaras and Levickas v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 6:48 am
Eric Goldman, director of the High Tech Law Center at Santa Clara University in the United States, questions that approach to regulating the Internet. [read post]
