Search for: "United States v. David" Results 1441 - 1460 of 6,864
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2009, 8:47 am
Assistant Solicitor General Eric Miller appeared next on behalf of the United States as an amicus curiae supporting the respondent. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm by Dan Stein
Holder, this Term’s challenge to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Court held that Section 4 of the law, which identifies the state and local governments that are subject to the Act’s “preclearance” requirement, is unconstitutional based on “current conditions” in the United States. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 11:53 am by Wells C. Bennett
Circuit’s Guantanamo detention saga: Suleiman v. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 2:30 am
  The United States as amicus will  be represented by David O’Neil, assistant to the U.S. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 9:51 am by Meg Martin
State Citation: 2010 WY 6Docket Number: S-08-0094Appeal from the District Court of Natrona County, the Honorable David B. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 10:18 am by Saf Hussain
Justice David Steel made an order granting NML permission to serve the proceedings out of the jurisdiction. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
  For over 200 years, not only in the United States but also in England, most people are deeply suspicious of any order of that kind. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:05 am
Copyright Office.Around June 2011, Jordan-Benel’s manager, Adam Peck, emailed David Kramer, Managing Director of Feature Productions at United Talent Agency (“UTA”), about Settler’s Day. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 7:05 am by David Klein
The proverbial battle of David versus Goliath is currently unfolding in United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
Solicitor General, who obviously has an interest on behalf of the United States in seeing to it that the provisions of the U.S. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 4:39 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court will consider whether a commercial fisherman violated the anti-shredding provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act when he destroyed several undersized fish. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am by Amy Howe
 In United States v. [read post]