Search for: "United States v. Gay"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 1,810
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2022, 8:03 am
By the end of 2014, gay marriage was legal in 35 states through either legislation or state court action. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 11:32 pm
In Whitehouse v Gay News Limited [1979] AC 617, the matter was debated in the House of Lords. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
NIFLA v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:55 am
United States.] [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 2:25 am
In a states' rights oriented decision, United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
United States (1920). [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 10:07 am
See Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 24 (Brief for United States); see also Brief for Equal Protection Constitutional Law Scholars as Amici Curiae. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm
These awards cannot be enforced against the defendant in the United States. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
The United States’ Stolen Valor Act criminalized lies about the receipt of a military decoration. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 12:42 am
Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990), is a United States Supreme Court case that determined that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote, even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 2:42 am
In Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 7:14 pm
Without embracing the equation made in Reynolds v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 4:02 pm
Dorf cited the landmark Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 9:49 pm
(See Amore v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:56 am
Mincing no words in her dissent, in which Justice Kagan joined, Justice Sotomayor wrote: “The United States of America is a Nation built upon the promise of religious liberty. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
The Court found that Regulation 3 does not carry the force of law (see Weiss v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:23 pm
Although they longed to marry, noted the Court, the two women at the heart of the case were unable to do so in the United States. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:23 pm
Although they longed to marry, noted the Court, the two women at the heart of the case were unable to do so in the United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 7:38 am
An explicit statement that courts’ regulating their own procedure was a proper judicial function came a few days later, in Bank of the United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:37 am
Russell KNAGGS and Ramzy KHACHIK v the United Kingdom – 46559/06 [2011] ECHR 1328 (30 August 2011) European Court of Human Rights: refusal to admit intercept evidence in court proceedings not breach of human rights. [read post]
