Search for: "United States v. Holder"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 4,280
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2017, 6:23 am
`The sole interest of the United States and the primary object in conferring the monopoly,’ this Court has said, `lie in the general benefits derived by the public from the labors of authors. [read post]
Will the United States survive the 2016 election (and 2017 Inauguration of Donald Trump)? Continuing
22 Feb 2017, 1:13 pm
Tomorrow I shall teach Prigg v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:44 pm
In Summa Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:27 pm
The United States as amicus curiae suggested a test, see Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 27–29, but Samsung and Apple did not brief the issue. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm
Not necessarily.Rumors have been circulating that the new EO will apply the same criteria as EO 13769 but expressly exempt green card holders, student visa holders, and other people with substantial contacts with the United States. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 1:44 pm
For instance, the burden onPapst is mitigated by Papst’s status as a non-practicingpatent holder residing outside the United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm
” (To support the nationwide injunction, Washington argued that immigration law had to be uniform; ironically, the state had opposed this exact argument in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:11 am
Our decision applies only to [cameras] for which the United States patent right has been exhausted by first sale in the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:11 am
Our decision applies only to [cameras] for which the United States patent right has been exhausted by first sale in the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:11 am
Our decision applies only to [cameras] for which the United States patent right has been exhausted by first sale in the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 6:38 pm
Since our client resided in Cleveland, Ohio, her application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 4:59 am
Separating out the green card holders, legal permanent residents, who were absurdly included at first, then ineptly excepted after, the concern for due process rights under the United States Constitution came from non-United States Citizens who were either on foreign soil or, per the odd technicalities of United States border law, had not entered the United States. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 4:28 pm
In Kleindienst v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 1:14 pm
United States consular officials process millions of visa applications annually (see the State Department’s latest statistics here). [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 11:52 am
Qualcomm is way bigger than Apple v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 9:21 am
Bush, 553 U.S. 723 (2008), Holder v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:24 am
Although we agree that “the Government’s interest in combating terrorism is an urgent objective of the highest order,” Holder v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:41 pm
Trump denying the government's request to stay the district court's order enjoining provisions of President Trump's Executive Order temporarily suspending travel to the United States for refugees and various other noncitizens (including legal permanent residents and visa holders). [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 6:04 pm
Tonight, the Ninth Circuit issued an unanimous ruling in State of Washington v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 3:42 pm
Zadvydas v. [read post]
