Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 1441 - 1460 of 10,389
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2023, 7:33 am
Moreover, there is no evidence that any United States marks come as close to VOGUE as Applicant’s EVOGUE mark. [read post]
26 May 2010, 3:00 am by Brad Walz
The United States Supreme Court recently ruled that agreements among associate members to license their trademarks to one vendor may violate the Sherman Act. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:44 am by Gene Quinn
Recently, the United States Patent and Trademark Office proposed changes to the rules of practice pertaining to the patent term adjustment provisions in view of the decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Novartis AG v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 8:30 am by Dan Ernst
Evans’s understanding of equality in United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 4:26 am
Trospium chloride, made by Madaus, was sold as "Céris" in France, as "uriVesc" in Germany and as “Regurin” in the United Kingdom -- where Madaus owned the United Kingdom trade mark REGURIN for pharmaceutical preparations etc in Class 5. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 11:27 am by Holly
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit continued its recent scrutiny of the practices of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in a non-precedential opinion issued November 22, 2023, regarding American Marriage Ministries’ challenge to the Universal Life Church’s “GET ORDAINED” trademark application based upon the alleged lack of distinctiveness and possibly failure to function as a mark for both classes of recited services. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:45 pm
(v) Whether the user of the mark or trade name intended to create an association with the famous mark. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm by Josh Blackman
Rather, the only parties that could bring the claim are the alien’s associates (relative or organization) within the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 3:26 am
The United States District Court for the District of Oregon reversed the Board's decision dismissing an opposition to registration of the mark MANIMAL for a wide variety of clothing, including "children’s clothing. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 4:05 am
As to actual confusion, since Shanghai has not exported any massage apparatus to the United States, "there has been no opportunity for actual, or potential, confusion to occur. [read post]
Gender Inequality in 21st Century Britain: Using litigation as a tool Direct Sex Discrimination and Disadvantage to women: R (Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 40 Introduction: Does Law Have a Gender? [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 6:44 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
Monday, October 3 marks the start of the United States Supreme Court's October Term. [read post]