Search for: ""citizen's united""
Results 1461 - 1480
of 3,970
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2011, 6:28 am
The New York Times examines “the increasingly blurry line between presidential candidates and the so-called Super PACs that have proliferated” in the wake of the Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 10:04 am
United States. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 8:06 am
Thisltethwaite continues: Here’s the point: If you are content to think that corporations are people and money is speech, as the Supreme Court decided in the by a vote of 5-4, in their Citizens United v Federal Election Commission decision, then indeed you are sleepwalking through your citizenship and giving over your faith to false prophets. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 5:30 pm
Maatman, Jr. of Seyfarth Shaw on the firm’s EEOC Year-End Countdown In Brief: The FEC’s New Citizens United Rules – Brian Svoboda and Andrew Werbrock of Perkins Coie on the firm’s blog, In the Arena: Law & Politics Update Star Wars: Redefining Trademark and Copyright Law Since A Long Time Ago – Minneapolis lawyer Tim Sitzmann of Winthrop & Weinstine on the firm’s DuetsBlog Lessons from the Ryder Cup: don’t blast the boss in front of… [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 12:59 pm
Last week at the Supreme Court of the United States was certainly a huge one, especially given the decision in Citizens United. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 12:00 am
My latest FindLaw column previews the Supreme Court's upcoming re-argument in Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:00 am
Cooper, AP) End Citizens United Request for Investigation into No Labels’ Tax-Exempt Status (End Citizens United) [Ed. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 5:00 am
Coincidentally, on Tuesday retired Justice John Paul Stevens criticized the Citizens United decision in an appearance in Florida; coverage comes from Jeff Schweers of the Gainesville Sun. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 6:46 pm
Hillary Clinton when she was running for president (Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 5:08 am
Election Law Blog continues its coverage of Citizens United, offering several historical commentaries on the recent oral re-arguments concerning campaign finance reform. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 11:18 am
When the Supreme Court released its decision in Citizens United, we all understood the immediate financial implications for media, but no one was quite sure just how great that impact would be. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:11 am
In Citizens United, Dean Kagan famously downplayed, if not abandoned, these rationales. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:15 am
The Montana Supreme Court upheld the ban in December, but three Montana corporations have asked the Supreme Court to stay the enforcement of that decision and, eventually, reverse it, on the ground that the lower court’s ruling conflicts with the Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 6:54 am
Daniel Henninger, over on WSJ.com, has some interesting observations on “the scrum inside the [Citizens United] decision between Justices Stevens and Scalia, over the status of corporations in America. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 10:57 am
How conservatives weaponized the First Amendment: “…The Citizens United campaign finance case, for instance, was decided on free-speech grounds, with the five-justice conservative majority ruling that the First Amendment protects unlimited campaign spending by corporations. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:16 am
Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United, a federal judge in Manhattan rejected a request from one group that wanted to convene outside the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse, The New York Law Journal reports. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 8:17 am
The NYT gives its opinion of the Supreme Court's just-concluded Term: [T]he tone and posture of the court’s conservative majority made clear that it is not done asserting itself in redefining campaign finance laws, the rights of corporations, national security powers and the ownership of guns....Much of this is the familiar hand-wringing over Citizens United. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 10:00 am
The Montana Supreme court pushed back against unlimited campaign spending by upholding the state Corrupt Practices Act, saying that Montana has a unique history of political corruption from the days of the copper kings. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 6:00 am
Federal Election Commission (2003) Citizens United v. [read post]
