Search for: "Billings v. Illinois"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 1,767
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2010, 1:19 am
Greenberg to Repay $3.2 Million in Fees due to Ex-Partner's Bill-Padding The American Lawyer Greenberg Traurig has agreed to pay a Chicago suburb $3.2 million after state prosecutors charged former government affairs partner Mark McCombs with inflating legal bills earlier this month. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
(IWP) v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 1:53 pm
Ford v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:30 am
(Patent Docs) Amevive (Alefacept) – US: False marking complaint filed in N D Illinois: Simonian v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 1:21 am
The main argument -- in terms of controversy and dollars -- centers on how much the firms are billing to prepare their bills. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 7:34 pm
Alexian Brothers Medical Center in Illinois like many hospitals is affected by Medicaid’s low reimbursement rates. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 8:15 am
V. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
(Property, intangible) (IPKat) District Court N D Illinois concludes no likelihood of confusion between AutoZone and OilZone/WashZone and AutoZone’s claims barred by laches (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) TTAB Precedential No. 8: You can’t move for summary judgment until after serving initial disclosures, says TTAB: Qualcomm Incorporated v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
(Property, intangible) (IPKat) District Court N D Illinois concludes no likelihood of confusion between AutoZone and OilZone/WashZone and AutoZone’s claims barred by laches (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) TTAB Precedential No. 8: You can’t move for summary judgment until after serving initial disclosures, says TTAB: Qualcomm Incorporated v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:38 am
The only potential relief for patent holders is a section of the current patent reform bill in the U.S. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:03 pm
By its language, the case seemingly applies Bishop v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 12:20 am
Greenberg Traurig Terminates Partner Facing Theft-of-Services Charges The American Lawyer Mark McCombs, a government affairs partner in the Chicago office of Greenberg Traurig, was arrested at home and charged Friday by state prosecutors in Illinois with bilking more than $1 million from a Chicago suburb through inflated legal bills, according to a report in the Chicago Tribune. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 1:12 pm
Ford v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm
The FAA reauthorization bill has not made it past the Senate, either, and user fees could be incorporated into that bill or through other legislative means. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Int'l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc (Gray on Claims) District Court N D Illinois: ‘Consisting of’ and ‘consisting essentially of’ are not substantially identical: Kim v Earthgrains Co. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Int'l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc (Gray on Claims) District Court N D Illinois: ‘Consisting of’ and ‘consisting essentially of’ are not substantially identical: Kim v Earthgrains Co. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 2:38 pm
The case before the high Court, LeBron v. [read post]
