Search for: "California Employment Law Letter"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 2,237
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2014, 3:32 am
"Although the federal Affordable Care Act does not compel employers to provide workers with health insurance that includes abortion coverage, the director of California's Department of Managed Health Care said in a letter to seven insurance companies on Friday that the state Constitution and a 1975 state law prohibits them from selling group plans that exclude the procedure. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 7:50 am
Florida law (unlike California’s) isn’t terribly plaintiff-friendly on this issue. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 7:56 am
Via H-Law, we have the following job posting:The History Department at the University of California, Irvine, seeks to hire a tenure-track assistant professor in 20th-century United States history whose research focuses on political economy, intellectual history, and/or legal history. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 2:20 pm
Employers are sometimes unaware that application of the antitrust laws is not limited to the commercial marketplace. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:00 am
Under California contract law, the revised handbook constituted a binding agreement between the parties. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:19 am
For more information on San Francisco’s “ban the box” ordinance, see the August 8, 2014, issue of California Employment Law Letter. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 6:30 am
All state laws vary. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 10:52 am
EB-5 is a provision in the United States immigration laws. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 11:18 am
More Blog Entries: California Employment Law: New new Donor Protection Act, December 7, 2013 Orange County Employment Lawyer Blog California’s Top Employment Law Mistakes, Oct. 26, 2013, Orange County Employment Lawyer Blog [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 6:43 am
The loan applications also listed false assets and were accompanied by various forged documents, including altered bank statements, fake W-2s, fake paystubs, and false gift letters and affidavits. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Moreover, under a 1987 ruling from the Supreme Court in California Federal Savings v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 6:33 pm
Startup owners should have a relationship with an attorney that actually practices California employment law. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:40 am
California Custody Rule. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 2:27 pm
Trounson to accept employment with a CIRM-funded company, state law prohibits him from:“1. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:28 am
Catherine Fisk is the Chancellor’s Professor of Law at University of California Irvine School of Law. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:42 am
No-match letter. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:00 am
(Court of Appeal decision discussed here.)On review, the California Supreme Court held as follows: Federal PreemptionThe federal Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) does not preempt the FEHA generally, nor does it preempt California's Senate Bill No. 1818, which provides in part: All protections, rights, and remedies available under state law, except any reinstatement remedy prohibited by federal law, are available to all individuals… [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 6:30 am
All state laws vary. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 10:00 am
Nor was Nordstrom required to inform the employee that continued employment after receiving the letter constituted acceptance of the new terms of employment. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:53 am
The denial letter stated that, based on the medical evidence, Plaintiff could perform light work with restrictions and that she had sufficient skills to obtain qualifying employment and she was not disabled for any occupation. [read post]
