Search for: "Does 1-71"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 2,540
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2014, 12:27 pm
Stat. 456.059) is permissive and like the Baker Act, it does not create an affirmative duty. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 11:00 pm
The court clarified a number of issues relating to the scope of Art. 22 No 1, the obligations of the court second seised under Art. 27(1) as well as the relationship between Art. 22 No 1 and 27(1) Brussels I-Regulation. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
., Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, 1 July 2008, no. 58243/00, § 62 and 63; Rotaru v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 3:32 pm
The White House fact sheet states that the EO “does not compel workers to discuss pay, nor does it require employers to publish or otherwise disseminate pay data – but it does provide a critical tool to encourage pay transparency, so workers have a potential way of discovering violations of equal pay laws and are able to seek appropriate remedies. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 5:24 am
”[3]I hope this suffices to entice the reader to consider Cottingham’s brief on behalf of the primary importance of spiritual praxis, one that does not, as with fideism, ignore, downplay, or even wholly displace the cognitive dimension of religion, but attempts rather to simply remove it from its pride of place in the philosophical study of religion. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
The court limited review to the following issue: Under what circumstances, if any, does the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
By Diane G. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:26 am
Holmes (no link yet available - see entire decision copied below this post) that temporary alimony, awarded before final judgment in a divorce action, does not have to be credited toward a calculation of the maximum term of general term alimony set by the 2011 Alimony Reform. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 4:24 am
Husband does it anyways. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
Zurn Industries, Inc., et al, 1-10-cv-00204 (ILND March 26, 2014, Order) (St. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 3:40 pm
Reg. 46783 (Aug. 1, 2013). [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 9:00 pm
Aside: that there is no generic prospectus requirement obviously does not mean that securities can randomly be offered to the general public. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 3:53 pm
What does that mean? [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 12:54 pm
IDEA Section 615(c)(1). [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 7:10 pm
” §766.106(1)(a), Fla. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 11:24 am
”) IDEA Section 615(b)(1). [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 2:00 am
Since the objectives of the proposed and currently enrolling trials are similar, reviewers agreed that the proposed Phase 1 trial does not add value and should be re-evaluated after completion and analysis of data from the current trial . [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 12:29 pm
Section 614 (a)(1)(D)(ii)(I). [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 10:00 am
[CRC 3.922(e)(1) (pdf)] H. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 7:00 am
The report shall include a recommendation on the following: 1. [read post]
