Search for: "Edwards v. Means"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 1,960
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2012, 5:21 pm
EDWARD J. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 2:16 am
Edward, Reconsidering the Legacy of New York Times V. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 10:33 am
Neumann v. [read post]
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 12 May 2022, a ruling on serious harm and defamatory meaning was handed down in Wilks v Qu [2022] VCC 620. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
Kaltag Tribal CouncilDocket: 09-960Issue(s): Whether Indian tribes in the State of Alaska have authority to initiate and adjudicate child custody proceedings involving a nonmember and then to compel the State to give full faith and credit to the decrees entered in those proceedings.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (unpublished, 9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's replyAmicus brief of Edward Parks and Donielle TaylorPetitioners' supplemental… [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
” From 1911 to 1936, under George V, it read, “Dei Gra Rex Et Ind Imp,” which stands for, Dei Gratia Rex et India Imperator, which means, “By the Grace of God, King and Emperor of India. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 8:18 am
In marked contrast to Federal policy for more than a generation, I believe we came up with a very reasonable and progressive policy, one that means that a major success for CIRM will not only mean a cure for a chronic disease, but a direct financial return to California's general fund, as it should. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 2:47 pm
Goldberg, After Frustration: Three Cheers for Chandler v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:35 am
I don't mean to suggest that legal liberalism and faith in the rule of law as central to the American way ever died. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 4:32 am
The appliance of science - lay advisers go to courtRight: unlike judges, cats spend up to 18 hours a day asleep ...Last Friday the Court of Appeal sneaked this decision out in Halliburton Energy Services Inc v Smith International (North Sea) Ltd [2006] EWCA 1599. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
In the 1932 Supreme Court case Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
In the 1932 Supreme Court case Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
To anyone for whom the centrality of philosophy to law might seem puzzling, Leiter explains, Law is, first and foremost, a discursive discipline: lawyers and judges live in the domain of reasons and meanings. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 12:02 pm
LEXIS 984 and EDWARD PEKIN vs. [read post]
NLRB Regional Directors retain authority to hold elections, certify results even absent Board quorum
22 Sep 2015, 8:48 am
Supreme Court’s 2010 ruling in New Process Steel, L.P. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 6:54 am
Pursuant to §18.2-365, adultery is a class 4 misdemeanor, meaning the maximum penalty is a $250 fine. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:39 am
Pursuant to §18.2-365, adultery is a class 4 misdemeanor, meaning the maximum penalty is a $250 fine. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:19 pm
Olivier v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:03 pm
This means that Mary’s litigation could hold up or invalidate Bob’s recap. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
He did, however, strike out the defendant’s Lucas-Box meanings on the ground that “advancing Lucas-Box meanings that are at variance with the actual meaning found by the Court is wrong in principle”. [read post]
