Search for: "GOLDSTEIN v. GOLDSTEIN"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 2,308
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2014, 8:42 am
On the one hand, states can expand federal IP rights beyond the scope allowed by federal law – for instance, by sanctioning contract rules that restrict buyers' use of copyrighted materials (held enforceable in ProCD v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:30 am
He remained close to the other Harlans, one of whom was Justice John Marshall Harlan — the “great dissenter” of the Supreme Court — who argued on behalf of equal rights under the law in Plessy v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:55 pm
(See Luzano v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 9:22 am
Navratilova even participated as one of the plaintiffs in the ACLU/Lambda Legal lawsuit challenging a 1992 anti-gay Colorado ballot initiative that ultimately resulted in the landmark Romer v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:43 pm
Session II: Panel Discussion: "Cultural Perspectives on Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging in Ombuds Work, facilitated by Marlo Goldstein-Hoder. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:45 am
Petition for certiorari Brief in oppositionReply of petitioner Cases involving lawyers from Goldstein & Russell (listed without regard to the likelihood of being granted): Pickering v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am
Jonathan Siegel at PrawfsBlawg notes that Bilski v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 1:30 am
This has included divine beings (Urantia Found. v Kristen Maaherra), gardens (Kelley v Chicago Park District) and monkeys (Naruto v Slater). [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 12:56 pm
ACTION NOTICE DATE CLAIM DUE DATE 2013-101 SEC v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 1:30 am
This has included divine beings (Urantia Found. v Kristen Maaherra), gardens (Kelley v Chicago Park District) and monkeys (Naruto v Slater). [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 4:07 am
At Understanding the ADA, William Goren notes that the court’s opinion in South Dakota v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein, Howe & Russell represented the petitioner in the case.] [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 7:24 am
Quon, NASA v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 3:49 am
Yesterday’s argument in State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 10:44 am
See, e.g., Parker v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 6:34 am
KSR v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 3:45 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 3:03 am
” Tom Goldstein offers some possibilities for how the court could handle the term’s yet-to-be-argued cases in a post on this blog. [read post]
