Search for: "Givens v. Givens" Results 1461 - 1480 of 76,032
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2024, 11:53 am by Steven Calabresi
Circuit opinion given that his appointment as Special Counsel was unconstitutional. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:41 am by Dan Bressler
” “In support of this argument, IMTC cited two foreign (and therefore non-binding) cases in which no conflict of interest was found to exist: Jones v AMP Perpetual Trustee Company NZ Ltd (1994) (New Zealand) and HSBC (HK) Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice (2001) (Hong Kong). [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:40 am by Dylan Gibbs
The Association can’t force the government to offer legislative protection without showing that other remedies are inadequate and that the government is responsible for the casino managers’ lack of bargaining power.An important standard of review clarification: The Court has given mixed signals in the past about how to judicially review findings of mixed fact and law connected to constitutional questions. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 5:53 am by Eleonora Rosati
Accordingly, the Board of Appeal compared the seven features (or sub-groups of features) of the prior design with the overall six features (or sub-groups of features) of the contested RCD (Case R 726/2021-3 para 51 et seq.).Pumas are bigger KatsIn doing so, the Board of Appeal correctly held that the point of reference for the assessment of the individual character is the contested RCD under examination given it is its validity which is at issue. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
It is a comment on Chapter V of Ernest Weinrib's book, Reciprocal Freedom, and was originally given as a talk at University of Toronto in 2023. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:49 pm by Amy Howe
” Much of Monday’s argument focused on the Supreme Court’s 1962 ruling in Robinson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:44 am by Guest Author
In particular, members of this group plan to release proposals for how to amend Article V, which contains the current means to amend the Constitution. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:50 am by James W. Ward
” Shah pointed to a California Supreme Court case (Schachter v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 7:06 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
The Court decided that it was, and that the opt-out application was invalid based on Rule 5(6) RoP, given that an “action” also includes PI proceedings (see p. 11-12). [read post]