Search for: "Jump v State"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 3,688
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2015, 10:57 am
” If they jump that hurdle, they will then have to show that they sought to end discrimination in the narrowest way possible, the usual basis on which laws fall under strict scrutiny standards. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 7:27 am
This is what Jaime tells us:Trademark trolls and trade mark hijacking in CubaThe start of negotiations and eventual opening of commercial relations between Cuba and United States is tempting some individuals to jump at the chance to register US trade marks in order to force trade mark holders to negotiate their entrance into the Cuban market. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 7:21 pm
Supreme Court’s decision last year in Burwell v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 5:27 am
The case is Feliciano v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 1:09 pm
A 1994 California case, Jefferson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
United States through Employment Div. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
Riva v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 6:58 am
The magistrate also recommended denying summary judgment on the issues of punitive damages and backpay (Zabell v. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 8:23 pm
After the jump, I’ll explain how King presents a golden opportunity for such a grand bargain. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 2:33 pm
Outros autores a desenvolveram, mas o fato é que no século XXI a formulação teórica de Von Bertalanffy, atende a várias ciências. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 8:36 am
The day-by-day schedule, with a brief summary of the question in each case, follows the jump. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 8:00 am
The officers jumped out of the way at the last moment; Tamerlan did not. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:48 pm
When King v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 10:43 am
Scalia immediately jumped in: “Do you think Congress is just going to sit there and let all of these disastrous consequences occur? [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:13 am
Justice Alito jumped in to help Carvin, saying that if a state was looking for information about tax credits, it would look to the tax code. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:15 pm
Arguing for California, Deputy Attorney General Robin Urbanski jumped right to the heart of the state’s position: Although the California Supreme Court did provide an “adjudication on the merits,” that adjudication was not its conclusion that the trial court violated Batson (and its California state law analogue); rather, it was its determination that any Batson error was “harmless. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:50 am
United States Capitol Police, No. 13-5072 (D.C. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:39 am
United States Capitol Police, No. 13-5072 (D.C. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:28 am
In Gordon v United States Capitol Police, No. 13-5072 (D.C. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:26 am
She identifies certification mark; what really jumped out in paper is the idea that these textile production units are family based—going to biological daughters rather than daughters in law. [read post]
