Search for: "LEAD CLASS PLAINTIFFS" Results 1461 - 1480 of 6,554
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2019, 2:41 pm by Ariel Yehezkel
The plaintiffs in these lawsuits also allege that undercover investigations have brought to light the fact that the company has had issues with various environmental violations and animal treatment in the past. [read post]
  Filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Texas by the lead plaintiff and GPB investor Millicent Barasch, the class action securities fraud case was announced at a press conference. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 3:34 am by Ronald Mann
[Disclosure: The author of this post represented the plaintiffs in Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 5:30 am by Beth Graham
A United States Magistrate Judge has reportedly recommended that retail giant Amazon’s motion to compel arbitration in a proposed class action lawsuit that was brought against the company over alleged children’s privacy violations be denied. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 10:50 am by Phil Dixon
Two guns were found near the residence and a third gun was found in the defendant’s car, leading to felon in possession charges. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 3:01 am
Plaintiffs in these lawsuits include individuals, water providers, water districts and state and local authorities. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 10:13 am by Jonathan Rosenfeld
District Judge William Orrick of the Northern District of California, who was already overseeing a class-action lawsuit brought against Juul in 2018 by 44 plaintiffs from 22 states. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 10:13 am by Jonathan Rosenfeld
District Judge William Orrick of the Northern District of California, who was already overseeing a class-action lawsuit brought against Juul in 2018 by 44 plaintiffs from 22 states. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 6:42 am by Silver Law Group
The deadline to apply to be lead plaintiff, or class representative, is December 6, 2019. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The start date of the class period is a key driver that is regularly used by plaintiffs to top the podium at the lead plaintiff contest. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 3:30 am by Linda S. Mullenix
Plaintiffs’ Attorneys Fees in Securities Fraud Class Actions, NYU Law and Economics Research Paper No. 19-31 (July 15, 2019), available at SSRN. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 6:06 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The Complaint On October 25, 2019, a plaintiff shareholder filed a securities class action lawsuit in the Northern District of California against three PG&E executives. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Eugene Volokh
(… actions in which the plaintiff alleged the Bennington Police Department unlawfully threatened and then prosecuted the plaintiff for criminal defamation after he sent complaints to state officials about the conduct of one of its officers). [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 8:35 am by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
The three lead individual plaintiffs range in age from forty-five to sixty-seven and have made their careers in telecommunications. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 1:18 pm by Joe Consumer
(See, e.g., Center for Justice & Democracy studies such as Lifesavers, a Guide to Lawsuits that Protect Us All; First Class Relief, How Class Actions Benefit Those Who Are Injured, Defrauded and Violated; and, The Importance of Civil Justice to Sexual Assault Survivors and the Devastating Consequences of Tort Reform. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:52 am by Dan Bressler
” “Johnson & Bell specializes in defending corporations against lawsuits, like those brought by Edelson and other plaintiffs’ law firms. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:46 pm by Jason Dubner
Unprecedented relief sought While the ICC argued that set-asides were a “not uncommon” means of ensuring “fair compensation from those who benefit from the[ir] extensive and valuable work . . . in leading this litigation,” Direct Action Plaintiffs countered that, in fact, “no MDL Court has ever entered a set-aside order in favor of an uncertified class. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:46 pm by Jason Dubner
Unprecedented relief sought While the ICC argued that set-asides were a “not uncommon” means of ensuring “fair compensation from those who benefit from the[ir] extensive and valuable work . . . in leading this litigation,” Direct Action Plaintiffs countered that, in fact, “no MDL Court has ever entered a set-aside order in favor of an uncertified class. [read post]