Search for: "MATTER OF C B J B"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 3,062
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2015, 10:46 am
However, the Court of Appeal agreed with Mann J's construction. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 11:03 pm
Its not b/c of them that I object, its because of YOU! [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 9:00 am
Nancy J. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 8:34 pm
The adult plaintiffs have demonstrated entitlement to public assistance and preliminary restraint pending outcome pursuant to federal law (42 USC 601, et seq.), state law (SSL §§131[1], 131-a[l], 350[l][a], 350[1][f], 350[j][3]; 18 NYCRR §§352.1,352.2,352.3, 372), NYS Constitution Article 17, and CPLR 6301, et seq. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 11:56 am
(b) The duration of the marriage. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:38 am
” Further, in Appeal 1404746, decided March 30, 2015, Hearing Officer Thomas J. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:38 am
” Further, in Appeal 1404746, decided March 30, 2015, Hearing Officer Thomas J. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 5:13 pm
Side C and Side B pol [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 5:43 pm
Sacks and Rachel B. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 4:29 pm
”In contrast section 8 of the Representation Agreement Act provides:Test of incapability for standard provisions8 (1) An adult may make a representation agreement consisting of one or more of the standard provisions authorized by section 7 even though the adult is incapable of(a) making a contract,(b) managing his or her health care, personal care or legal matters, or(c) the routine management of his or her financial affairs.(2) In deciding whether an… [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 4:57 am
May 15, 2015) (Lee, J.). [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 10:30 am
As a matter of fact, www.droitdu.net was mainly put together with student-produced content. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:12 am
Sep. 9, 2015) (Kendall, J.). [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 12:46 pm
Retailer defendants petitioned the PTO for Covered-Business-Method-Review and then immediately petitioned for a stay of the district court proceeding under AIA Section 18(b). [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 2:29 pm
In June, journalist Chuck C. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 1:57 pm
After the Supremes trashed the residual clause of § 924(e)(2)(B) in Johnson, is there a constitutionally-valid crime-of-violence definition in § 924(c)(3)(A) that includes the charges here? [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am
Same was true of Goodyear about personal jurisdiction—J. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am
Here is one that is not discussed: shifting the burden of proof on admissibility to the opponent of the expert witness’s opinion: “Testimony from an expert is presumed to be helpful unless it concerns matters within the everyday knowledge and experience of a lay juror. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 10:41 am
” In determining whether such compelling factor, consideration, or circumstance exists, the court must, to the extent applicable, examine and consider, individually and collectively, the following: (a) the seriousness and circumstances of the offense; (b) the extent of harm caused by the offense; (c) the evidence of guilt, whether admissible or inadmissible at trial; (d) the history, character and condition of the defendant; (e) any exceptionally serious misconduct of law… [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 1:21 pm
Zoe is a barrister at St John’s Chambers, who specialises in financial matters after a relationship ends. [read post]
