Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 9,179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2019, 3:52 am
In short: no trade, no trademark.Two US Court of Appeals opinions have created the possibility that a plaintiff could bring a passing-off action based on use of its trademark outside of the United States only – a powerful new tool for challenging infringers that are first to use the trademark in the United StatesFollowing the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Lexmark International, Inc v Static Control Components, Inc (572 US ___, 134 S Ct 1377 (2014)),… [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
It also suggests the extent of the uniqueness of the premises that mark the boundaries of judicial power and their role in government and with law. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 9:28 am
Both men came to the United States as young children, Mark from South Korea and Richard from Jamaica. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am
United States, in which the justices held that a judge’s simultaneous service on two military courts does not violate the dual-officeholder ban. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 5:17 am
[with implications for the pending Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 10:14 am
In Chutter, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 10:14 am
In Chutter, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 8:55 am
United States by the U.S. [read post]
16 May 2023, 4:00 am
We affirm the three-judge panel’s Harper v. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 8:23 am
Rascal House, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 3:04 am
Jacobs v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 12:39 pm
In Hellweg v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:24 am
BackgroundIn 2008, Yannick Noah, a French former tennis player, registered the following figurative sign (the Mark) as a European Union trade mark (EUTM), in respect of a number of categories of goods, including leather goods, clothing, games and playthings (the Registration): In 2019, Noah Clothing LLC, a clothing company based in the United States, filed an application with the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) seeking revocation of… [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 5:48 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 8:22 am
" (internal quotation marks omitted)); United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 7:00 am
Department of State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 4:19 am
State Permits, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 5:46 pm
Google v China: Do we know corporate social responsibility when we see it? [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
Whatever your feelings about the doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales], it's a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 4:05 am
Hodge ... and United States v. [read post]
