Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 4,554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2013, 9:27 am
Cisson v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 10:29 am
The most notable example of this practice is the Supreme Court’s own 1942 decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 9:06 am
Cir. 1923; State v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 10:48 am
Gerrymandering used to be an art, but advanced computation has made it a science. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 3:45 am
. . .Less clear is the scope of information encompassed by PII, and how, precisely, this information must identify a person. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 6:49 am
Do all jurisdictions have to have the same standards of mens rea for using deadly force in self-defense?) [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
Brown v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 3:38 am
Union’s use of public office space.2. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 8:31 am
Based on Skidmore v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 1:56 pm
Instead, the court implicitly adopts the Daubert standard (a standard used in other jurisdictions – ironically, those that don’t even use urine testing – that allows judges to simply take judicial notice of reliability of urine testing). [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 6:50 am
Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal Campaigns Say They’ll Match Political Contributions. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 9:05 am
Raniere v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 5:52 am
Steel Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:02 pm
” The Supreme Court found that standard allowed claims that “lack the precision § 112, ¶ 2 demands. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:33 pm
(Goleta Union School Dist. v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:16 am
And when I say "the New York Times standard was met," I mean the legal standard from the case New York Times v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:29 pm
In Lehman v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 7:24 am
Case Name: Large v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 7:24 am
Case Name: Large v. [read post]
