Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 4,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2018, 1:16 pm
” The broader claims are not expressly limited to the particular statistic used, while the dependent claims require alternatively require “indirect standardization” (Claim 25) or “indirect standardization” (Claim 26) of the weighting. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 3:04 am
In addition, some of the criteria of the “Sieckmanm 7” has been codified into the new law and therefore some of the same standards still apply, such as signs much be “clear” and “precise”.Overall it was an insightful and interesting day - see you there next time! [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 5:58 pm
Here's an excerpt from the opinion, NRA v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 5:16 am
Miller and Smith v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:35 pm
The first step requires the Court decide whether Congress has directly spoken to a precise factual application in the statutory language. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:49 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 9:14 am
.[*]In “Facebook v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Schrand, 2018-Ohio-3787.Background of Mezher v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Schrand, 2018-Ohio-3787.Background of Mezher v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 11:43 am
In contrast, the Court of Appeal held that a hard-edged non-discrimination rule has the potential to harm the technological development of standards if it has the effect of compelling the SEP owner to accept a level of compensation for the use of its invention which does not reflect the value of the licensed technology. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 8:04 am
We will suggest that in seeking to more deeply embed the core postulate of collectivity within its own theoretical structures, emerging notions of Chinese Leninism has given us a glimpse at the possibilities of an accountability-based structure of governance that is in its essence robustly democratic. . [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 10:29 am
McGill v. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 8:50 am
The trial court, in Ruff v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 4:34 am
(I used to waffle about the parallel issue in connection with Cohen v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:17 am
Question: You write of Justice John Marshall Harlan’s famous solo dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 5:00 am
In last term’s Jennings v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
Gienapp uses the example of the Virgina 1782 Case of the Prisoners (Commonwealth v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:23 pm
Rather it was used as a provocative metaphor, which frantically affirmed Terentyev’s wish to see the police “cleansed” of corrupt and abusive officers (“infidel cops”). [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:42 pm
Nottingham City Council v Parr & Anor [2018] UKSC 51 It is not every day you see the Supreme Court setting HMO licence conditions, but today is that day. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 7:28 am
The “necessary in a democratic society” test (shades of Palko) To a US-trained lawyer, the language “necessary in a democratic society” calls to mind the famous “essential to a scheme of ordered liberty” standard the Supreme Court developed in its “Incorporation” jurisprudence, as seen for example in Palko v. [read post]
