Search for: "Parker v. Parker" Results 1461 - 1480 of 2,351
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2014, 12:00 pm by Jason Rantanen
Benson, 409 U.S. 63, 67-68 (1972); Parker v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 3:32 am by SHG
There may be no sign over the Chittenden Regional Correctional Facility in Vermont, but for pre-trial detainees, a sign might have read "arbeit macht frei," according to the Second Circuit in McGarry v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 10:40 am
. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Statement of Facts: State of Florida v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 11:54 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
In likewise rejecting that claim the Court stated: "blight is an elastic concept that does not call for an inflexible, one-size-fits-all definition (see Berman v Parker, 348 US 26, 33-34 [1954]). [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 12:05 pm by Amy Howe
Varjabedian (April 15): In a lawsuit alleging violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether a private plaintiff has to show that a person who made a false statement intended to do so, or whether it is enough that the false statement was made negligently Parker Drilling Management Services v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 1:34 pm by John Elwood
Caldwell (relisted after 2/25 Conference) Docket: 10-622 Issue(s): (1) Whether a binding agreement among multiple states and private companies is immunized from antitrust scrutiny under the state-action immunity doctrine of Parker v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 3:08 pm
Bill Moyers' Journal on 4 Sept 09 had a debate of sorts between Trevor Potter and Floyd Abrams over issues surrounding Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:15 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Ct. 3218, 3225 (2010) (noting that whether claims are di- rected to statutory subject matter is a “threshold test”); Parker v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:43 pm by John Elwood
Dukes involving the standard for class-action certification, and a fourth time in Parker v. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 12:03 pm by Eric Goldman
This is a major ruling validating the legitimacy of competitive keyword advertising, which occurs when an advertiser purchases and displays ads triggered in response to third-party trademarks. [read post]