Search for: "Patrick v. State" Results 1461 - 1480 of 2,817
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2015, 8:05 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The BLM itself in 1978 issued an explanatory pamphlet stating that the annual filings were to be made "on or before December 31" of each year. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 5:59 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Gist and Gist, Kennedy & Associates, Inc.Case Number: 13-cv-01833 (United States District Court for the Northen District of Georgia)Case Filed: May 31, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: May 1, 2015 6/30/15 9/28/15 2015-55 SEC v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:46 am
Domonkos, Appellate Counsel.Representing Appellee (Plaintiff): Patrick J. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 2:40 am
If you need assistance with a citation using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library.]Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Pinther v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 1:22 pm by Eugene Volokh
State (1939)), and the right to leaflet extends even to nonpublic forum government property such as airports (see ISKCON v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 11:31 pm
’s position on the global stage than other candidates. [46] V. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 11:59 am
Patrick Kennedy, the defendant in this case, Kennedy v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 1:05 am by INFORRM
The draft regulation is now under debate in the Council of States. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:23 am
Brekka, 581 F.3d 1127, 1130-31 (9th Cir. 2009) and Int’l Airport Centers LLC v. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 9:28 am by Tia Sewell
Patrick McDonnell summarized the oral argument in the Supreme Court’s Collins v. [read post]
The sanction was imposed under the court’s inherent power to manage its own affairs, and specifically to sanction misconduct by an attorney that involves that attorney’s violation of a court order or other misconduct that is not undertaken for the client’s benefit (quoting United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 3:56 am by SHG
In a ghoulish and deeply disturbing decision, the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, in Albrecht v. [read post]