Search for: "People v. Davis" Results 1461 - 1480 of 2,069
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2008, 4:09 am
The police were then contacted (R. 135).Snell said that it was not difficult to go under the house to seewhere the depression was located, and that there were houses onboth sides of the DeCarr residence, and people from those houses could see what they were doing (R. 138-39). [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:44 pm by Elie Mystal
But maybe people shouldn’t be so quick to dismiss concerns about legacy admissions. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 5:35 am
Here is Justice Alito’s introduction in Davis v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, November 12, 2008 Davie v. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
Davis said that the UK legal system allows people with “nefarious intentions” and “exceptionally deep pockets” to “threaten, intimidate and put the fear of God into British journalists, citizens, officials and media organisations”. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 10:37 am by JURIST Staff
Furthermore, it was held in Davis v United States (8th Cir. 1917) that a public trial is broadly defined as a trial at which the public is free to attend. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 3:57 am by Russ Bensing
  In Bryant, you’ll recall (and if you don’t you can read about it here), the Court expanded upon the “primary purpose” test for determining whether a statement is testimonial, which the Court had earlier established in Davis v. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Morrisons supermarket chain has been fined for breaking the law on how people’s personal information should be treated when sending marketing emails. [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 12:54 am by INFORRM
On 5 November 2024, the Court of Appeal heard the appeal in Salman Iqbal v Geo TV Limited. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The new FCC chairman has announced plans to stop a privacy rule that would limit what internet service providers can do with people’s private data. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am by Jasmine Joseph
However, at the time Davis was decided, the Court had earlier determined in Griggs v. [read post]