Search for: "Phillips v. Phillips"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 3,828
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2015, 5:15 am
=@Phillips , 515 F.3d at 235; see alsoWilkerson v. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 10:24 am
Phillips, 2024 VT 10. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 8:17 am
Phillips, Wyoming Attorney General; David L. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 2:48 pm
Bard, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 8:16 pm
Rambus Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:29 pm
BLOMQUIST v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 8:02 am
WALKER v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 10:16 am
That’s what Paton v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 3:53 am
His opinion in Lawrence paves the way for such a position (as Justice Scalia emphasized in his dissent), and I think he and the Court majority will apply the logic in the Loving v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 9:49 am
This statute has been held invalid (see Lett v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 9:03 am
The Federal Circuit’s opinion on Monday in Bascom v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 10:10 am
(See Martinez v. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 10:03 am
” Phillips v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm
See Medicines Co. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:28 am
Phillips, Attorney General; David L. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
In NLRB v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 3:30 am
As the IAS court found, the allegations underlying plaintiff’s malpractice claim were couched in terms of “gross speculations” about future events, without the requisite factual basis to support the allegation (see Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1st Dept 1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 759 [2000]). [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 3:11 am
While counsel’s communications and statements surrounding the withdrawal of the action filed in New York, which we assume to be true on a CPLR 3211 (a)(7) motion, and defendants’ subsequent reliance on said withdrawal in a California action, are troubling, the complaint fails to allege damages proximately caused by the alleged deceit (see Doscher v Mannatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, 148 AD3d 523, 524 [1st Dept 2017]). [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:24 am
Following the High Court decision that the maximum time that a person can be held in police detention is 96 hours, including time spent on police bail (unless there is new evidence justifying further arrest), and the Government plan to introduce emergency legislation to reverse the decision, the Supreme Court has issued the following ruling: “On 30 June 2011 the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom granted permission to appeal in this case and the appeal will be heard on 25 July by Lords… [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 7:35 pm
By Stevie Phillips Anthony Laren Tweedy, II was convicted of initiation of a process to manufacture methamphetamine and manufacture of methamphetamine. [read post]
