Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 1461 - 1480 of 178,347
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2024, 7:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
Lancaster Foods, LLC, the Court looked at the question as to whether parties can contractually limit the statute of limitations in which a plaintiff or arbitration claimant can file its claim for relief. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 5:56 am by Bob Hoffer
However, Judge Ada Brown’s ruling suggests that the plaintiffs, including Ryan LLC, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
  However, the court dismissed plaintiff's Title VII disparate impact claim and his 1st Amendment Free Exercise claim. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 9:59 pm by Josh Blackman
Still, the plaintiffs never alleged that President Trump acted pursuant to any government policy or custom. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by Thomas Gremillion
Among other arguments, the plaintiffs in Texas Food Industry Association v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 6:01 pm by Daniel Schwartz
The court’s decision puts a temporary hold on the rule as applied to these Plaintiffs, which was set to take effect in September, pending a review of the FTC’s authority to enforce such a sweeping prohibition. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 4:53 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
Courts may also require the defendant to pay the trade secret plaintiff damages for revenues or profits the defendant will generate in the future by using the plaintiffs trade secret. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 3:19 pm by Amy Howe
The court in Corner Post ruled that the window to challenge an action by a federal agency, a six-year statute of limitations, begins to run when the plaintiff is injured, even if that injury comes long after the action occurs. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 2:55 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
Judge Ada Brown has issued a preliminary injunction postponing the rule’s effective date, at least for the plaintiffs. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 2:41 pm by Ben Sperry
But more fundamentally, the agency’s legal reasoning is simply not persuasive. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 2:18 pm by Tobin Admin
The purpose of Georgia’s apportionment statute, O.C.G.A. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 1:32 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The second design, Plaque D’egout, wasn’t included in the email, but it was plausibly alleged that someone at LVMH looked up plaintiffs on the internet after plaintiffs’ work was brought to LVMH’s attention, found their Plaque D’egout design, and copied it. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 12:15 pm by ricelawmd_3p2zve
After all, if this method were used for a plaintiff with permanent injuries, the result would be an infinite amount of financial compensation, which no court is going to award to a plaintiff. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 9:39 am by Jon L. Gelman
"Court's Decision:Dismissed the claim against IPC.The plaintiff failed to meet the burden of proof for either prong of the intentionally wrong test.Conduct prong: The TAC (Third Amended Complaint) does not allege facts demonstrating IPC knew its practices were virtually certain to result in injury.Context prong: Injury from cleaning machinery is considered a normal part of "industrial life" within the WCA's scope.Plaintiff's… [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 9:18 am
It's very difficult to look at particular individuals who were hired and compare them to individuals who were not hired. [read post]