Search for: "Read v. State" Results 1461 - 1480 of 65,311
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm by Rosalind English
Sufi and Elmi v United Kingdom – 8319/07 [2011] ECHR 1045 (28 June 2011) – Read judgment Somalia has been without a functioning government since 1991, riven, since then, by violence between rival clans and sub-clans and largely at the mercy of extreme Islamist groups with one aim in common: sabotaging any efforts by the international community to install a transitional government. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The Mississippi Supreme Court reversed again, this time concluding that the State violated Batson v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 12:02 am
In this action, California seeks damages against several major automakers on the grounds of state and federal public nuisance law.The District Court dismissed on the ground that the case raises non-justiciable political questions, with a particular focus on the third factor of Baker v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 10:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Heldman, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia adopted the narrower reading of the CFAA. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 8:08 am by Michael D. Smith
A recent European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) case (Barbulescu –v- Romania) has attracted much publicity in the UK press as giving employers the green light to read employees’ private emails. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 8:08 am by Michael D. Smith
A recent European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) case (Barbulescu -v- Romania) has attracted much publicity in the UK press as giving employers the green light to read employees’ private emails. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 4:30 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Cert Petition Question presented: In light of the clear precedent of Nevada v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 7:07 pm
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v Seljan, October 23, 2008, upheld federal officials seizure of the defendant's letters during a routine search. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 5:35 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Does the court of federal claims have jurisdiction to enter a judgment on an illegal exaction claim when the United States had previously awarded money to a recipient under a grant-in-aid statute and then unlawfully recouped the funds? [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 11:13 am
Saul CornellDepartment of History,Ohio State UniversityThe recent decision in Parker v. [read post]