Search for: "Seven Cases v. United States" Results 1461 - 1480 of 4,161
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2018, 1:43 pm by Mark Ashton
J[ay] Blackledge was born in the Ukraine in 2008 but is a United States citizen. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 4:49 am by SHG
At the WaPo Conspiracy, insomniac lawprof Orin Kerr posts about an important Second Circuit opinion: The Second Circuit has handed down a very important new Fourth Amendment case, United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Guest Author
All the other cases were decided under Step One or under an exception, such as United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 6:25 am by Jayesh Rathod
Lawful permanent residents seeking cancellation of removal must demonstrate, among other things, seven years of continuous residence in the United States. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 4:45 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
(“GPNE”) appeals from a final decision ofthe United States District Court for the Northern Districtof California. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
The decisionThe IPO’s decision focused on the words of section 3(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, which states that “trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character” -- an absolute bar to registration that comes from Article 3(1)(b) of the Trade Mark Directive and is paralleled in Article 7(1)(b) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-37/03 BioID v OHIM stated that the… [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:00 am
Indeed, the United States argues that “Officer Perez . . . did not know that he had a duty to diligently pursue the drafting and eventual approval of the warrant by a detached magistrate. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 3:42 pm by Jon Gelman
(Reporting by Ben Hirschler; Editing by Crispian Balmer)[Click here to see the rest of this post]Found onRelated articlesChemical at Goodyear Plant Linked to Bladder Cancer in 50 Workers (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)Medical Device Litigation: Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 7:18 am
  It prefaced its analysis of the issues in this case by explaining that the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution provides, `The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause. . . . [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 6:50 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This was also an issue in the 1892 United States Supreme Court case, Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York v. [read post]