Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 1461 - 1480 of 12,568
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2023, 1:31 pm by Unknown
Lummi Nation (Fishing Treaty Rights) United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:37 am by Public BLAWG
December 27, 2011, by Dawn McIntosh The Court of Federal Claims’ recent opinion in Casitas Municipal Water District v. the United States, Court of Federal Claims No. 05-168L (Dec. 5, 2011) is the latest chapter in a legal battle between water diverters and fish in California. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 6:51 am by Epstein Becker Green
The landscape changed drastically in 2010 when the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:02 pm by Epstein Becker Green
The landscape changed drastically in 2010 when the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 6:59 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
The landscape changed drastically in 2010 when the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:00 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
The landscape changed drastically in 2010 when the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:00 am by Epstein Becker Green
The landscape changed drastically in 2010 when the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 6:59 am by Epstein Becker Green
The landscape changed drastically in 2010 when the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 2:40 am by Florian Mueller
The issue has also widened because the DOJ and the same state AGs as in the litigation that was originally started by Epic brought a motion for sanctions in the United States et al. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 1:16 pm by robin.hall@capstonelawyers.com
For a court to be bound by a decision of the United States Supreme Court, rather than the California Supreme Court, the United States Supreme Court must have decided the same question differently. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:44 pm by WIMS
The judgment below is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit with directions that it instruct the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California to dismiss the case as moot in its entirety." [read post]