Search for: "State v. Bill"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 19,525
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2017, 9:36 am
Schedule 6 contains modifications to be made to the GDPR articles (e.g., by changing references to member states to refer to the United Kingdom) so that they will continue to apply after Brexit. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
The 1946 Supreme Court decision in SEC v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 12:15 am
Almond All. of California v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 2:26 am
The purpose of this post is two-fold: one, to look at the 2018 amendment Bill and see if the criticisms of the Bill by the Supreme Court in BCCI v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 5:04 am
Handler, M.D., P.C. v DiNapoli, 2014 NY Slip Op 03191, Court of AppealsAmong the patients treated by a physician and a medical group [Providers] were individuals insured by the Empire Plan, New York State's primary health benefit plan. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 7:34 pm
Two of the many defendants in the ill-fated Rakofsky v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
United States (Arizona's likely appeal to the Supreme Court of United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 11:09 am
State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2016state.html Kitras v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 11:15 am
Ducey (Casino Construction, Authorized Indian Gaming)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2015state.htmlAshlee W. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 8:50 pm
Dep't of Interior (wind turbines, cultural impacts)* State Courts Bulletin Cases featured:Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:30 am
Zinke (Land into Trust)Alexander v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:30 am
Zinke (Land into Trust)Alexander v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 9:26 am
” The bill reportedly includes amendments to the “honest services” mail and wire fraud statute, which Skilling v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 8:36 am
He’s Wrong * Senate’s “Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act of 2017”–and Section 230’s Imminent Evisceration * The “Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act of 2017” Bill Would Be Bad News for Section 230 * WARNING: Draft “No Immunity for Sex Traffickers Online Act” Bill Poses Major Threat to Section 230 * The Implications of Excluding State Crimes from 47 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 11:31 am
Forrest v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 11:31 am
Forrest v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 8:26 pm
The state statute codified into law the California Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 10:15 am
State v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 11:47 am
Lamott (Violence Against Women Act) United States v. [read post]
