Search for: "State v. Bill" Results 1461 - 1480 of 19,639
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2010, 7:54 pm by zshapiro
Besides Alito’s plurality decision in McDonald v. [read post]
28 Apr 2025, 5:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is well-settled that “[i]f a defendant client’s legal malpractice claim is intertwined with a plaintiff law firm’s claim for legal fees, the plaintiff will not be entitled to summary judgment on its account stated claim” (Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady, LLP v Rose, 111 AD3d 453, 454 [1st Dept 2013]) and since the “alleged conduct which forms the basis for the malpractice [counterclaims] occurred during the billing period at… [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 12:22 pm
Stuffed into an 835-page federal transportation bill and given just 20 minutes of discussion by legislators in the House of Representatives, the measure preempted state vicarious liability laws in personal injury cases with regard to vehicle owners who rent or lease vehicles. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 11:50 am
Previously, the state adhered to the Frye standard, which was established by the 1923 case of Frye v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 2:26 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
 The purpose of this post is two-fold: one, to look at the 2018 amendment Bill and see if the criticisms of the Bill by the Supreme Court in BCCI v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 9:36 am by Eduardo Ustaran and Sam Choi
Schedule 6 contains modifications to be made to the GDPR articles (e.g., by changing references to member states to refer to the United Kingdom) so that they will continue to apply after Brexit. [read post]
13 May 2014, 5:04 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Handler, M.D., P.C. v DiNapoli, 2014 NY Slip Op 03191, Court of AppealsAmong the patients treated by a physician and a medical group [Providers] were individuals insured by the Empire Plan, New York State's primary health benefit plan. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
United States (Arizona's likely appeal to the Supreme Court of United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 8:36 am by Eric Goldman
He’s Wrong * Senate’s “Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act of 2017”–and Section 230’s Imminent Evisceration * The “Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act of 2017” Bill Would Be Bad News for Section 230 * WARNING: Draft “No Immunity for Sex Traffickers Online Act” Bill Poses Major Threat to Section 230 * The Implications of Excluding State Crimes from 47 U.S.C. [read post]