Search for: "State v. K. T."
Results 1461 - 1480
of 3,543
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2007, 6:15 am
Thomas K. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 7:34 am
The court also did not act unreasonably by imposing the maximum fine of $500,000, despite the known likelihood that the employer would be unable to pay a substantial fine since it had ceased operations (United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 8:16 am
All the while, the world is waiting with bated breath to see what the Supreme Court has to say about Dukes v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 6:14 am
’ (In re Sheena K. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
* Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 1:53 pm
The defendant's 2011 10-K acknowledged that failure by its employees or subcontractors to comply with state or federal labor law could cause financial and reputational harm to the company. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 7:15 pm
State and Chicone v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
Dep’t of State, the D.C. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:55 pm
NLRB’s Challenge To Arizona Constitution’s Secret Ballot Provision In NLRB v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 7:07 pm
(Yu v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:40 am
LSUC, SOCAN v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 1:16 pm
(Indeed, the Ninth Circuit recently held in Oracle v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 4:14 am
Shahdad v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 5:13 am
Public K-12 school systems and state legislatures have the power to define their curriculum and can block such lesson plans; but I don't think the federal government should do so, whether directly or as a condition of federal subsidies, especially since this standard would inevitably end up applying based on viewpoint. [read post]
20 May 2009, 12:28 pm
Before PSI was returned, the trial judge : a/k/a "the lord's gift to jurisprudence" opined something to the effect of "Well, I won't take a CTS plea. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 5:19 am
" KME Germany GmbH v. [read post]
9 May 2009, 12:39 am
(news item here) The three member panel comprising two retired HC judges Justices S N Sahai and P K Sareen, was understood to have stated in no uncertain terms that the inflammatory speeches made by Varun were not enough to attract the deterrent provisions of the NSA and the action takes was disproportionate to the nature of the alleged crime committed by Varun Gandhi. [read post]
18 May 2012, 9:29 am
Mensing doesn't apply and there is no pre-emption per Wyeth v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 1:09 pm
Reply comments stated that DVDs dominate the marketplace. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 12:55 am
In Córdoba v. [read post]
