Search for: "State v. Levine" Results 1461 - 1480 of 1,753
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2010, 11:26 pm by INFORRM
  Similar views have been recently expressed by another very experienced Australian judge, David Levine in a lecture entitled “Reputation, Celebrity, Money and Juries – a 21st Century Reconsideration”. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:07 am by Dennis Crouch
The increase can be seen as a consequence of the decision in eBay v. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
“We are an extraordinarily fragmented society across inter-group lines,” says Brian Levin, the director of the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at Cal State San Bernardino. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 5:59 am
  Anti-Retaliation Under Federal and State Discrimination & Wage-Hour Laws; Implications of Burlington Northern v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 4:59 am
  Then, the court walked through the basic holdings of Levine, Mensing and Bartlett. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 11:29 pm
Apotex) (5/21/07)Preemption news (Levine v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm by Bexis
  There've been a raft of good decisions, although none from the United States Supreme Court, for all us practitioners on the right (in more ways than one) side of the “v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 1:37 am by INFORRM
The Commission has contacted EU member states to trace any Bluesky offices within the region but has not reached out to the company directly. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance, Privacy and App Tracking Burris, S., de Guia, S., Gable, L., Levin, D.E., Parmet, W.E., Terry, N.P. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am by INFORRM
The biggest legal story of this coming week will be the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union – the Article 50 “Brexit” judgment. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:23 am by FDABlog HPM
Levine holding that a state tort action against a brand name drug manufacturer for failure to provide an adequate warning label was not preempted. [read post]