Search for: "State v. Light" Results 1461 - 1480 of 25,983
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2022, 4:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In light of this determination, plaintiffs’ remaining contentions have been rendered academic. [read post]
3 May 2023, 2:20 am by Frank Cranmer
Cite this article as: Frank Cranmer, "The Missionary’s Position in the 2020s: Ossewaarde v Russia" in Law & Religion UK, 3 May 2023, https://lawandreligionuk.com/2023/05/03/the-missionarys-position-in-the-2020s-ossewaarde-v-russia/ [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 3:43 pm
CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC (2014) 59 Cal.4th 348 (Iskanian) precluded enforcement of PAGA waivers, but asserted that Iskanian was wrongly decided and in any event was no longer good law in light of the 2018 opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 4:57 am by Russ Bensing
Ice had implicitly overruled State v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 6:25 am
”Since the accident occurred some 16 hours after the blackout had begun, more than 20 sets of backup batteries would have been required in order to illuminate all of the stairways.Ultimately, according to Catterson, since the duration of a blackout can vary, any attempt to quantify the adequacy of backup battery supplies in order to determine whether the building owners had failed to provide an adequate supply would be completely arbitrary and without any legal effect.It seems that despite… [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 2:15 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In delivering the lead judgment Lord Wilson stated that the court had to consider the SSHD’s policy relating to the detention of mentally ill persons pending deportation and the effect of any failure by the SSHD to apply that Policy, in the light of R (Francis) [2014] EWCA Civ 718. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 4:56 pm
" How many prosecutors does it take to change a light bulb at the SAO? [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 5:53 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This Section 1983 action involves the overly complex questions of whether the public display of religious symbols and lights violates the separation of church and state. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 5:28 am by John H Curley
" It also argued that because the cba used the terms spouse as well as significant other, those terms should be interpreted to be interchangeable.Arbitrator Sarah R Cole has issued an award, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]