Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 19,778
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2012, 12:01 pm
Bethesda Softworks LLC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 1:51 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 7:25 am
V. [read post]
31 May 2010, 7:00 am
Horst v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
A political subdivision of the State may provide for the defense and indemnification of its officers and employees sued in state or federal court involving the performance of official duties Bonilla v Town of Hempstead, 2015 NY Slip Op 06916, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentFormer Hempstead Town Clerk Mark A. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 11:21 am
The states were required to yield to national supremacy (reinforced by Article V’s Supremacy Clause). [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 6:21 pm
Contents include:LectureSundaresh Menon, A Tale of Two Systems: The Public and Private Faces of Investor-State Dispute Settlement Case CommentsJulien Chaisse, Consutel Group SpA in liquidazione v People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria: Umbrella Clauses and Breaches of Contract by Public Entities Gabriel M Lentner & Dayana Zasheva, Bridgestone v Panama: Denial of Justice in a Trade Mark Dispute and the Locus Standi of a Licensee in International… [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:23 pm
McKee (10th Cir., July 20, 2016) (affirming dismissal of Williams' ss 1983 claims for termination in violation of due process because his complaint failed to state any constitutional violation, and refusal to exercise jurisdiction of Williams' state-law retaliation claim)Discrimination / Retaliation*Hollis v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:48 pm
In 2003, he pled guilty to one count of “counterfeit of a registered mark” in violation of California Penal Code § 350(a)(2), which imposes criminal penalties on any person who “willfully manufactures, intentionally sells, or knowingly possesses for sale any counterfeit of a mark registered with the Secretary of State or registered on the Principal Register of the United States Patent and Trademark… [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 6:48 am
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) correctly determined that a Korean biopharmaceutical company did not use in commerce the mark for a nutritional product that purportedly improves brain performance, the United States Court for the Federal Circuit has held. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 12:54 pm
City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
The problem is, just two years ago, in Walker v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:36 am
Upcoming Proceedings and Developments in United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 8:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 11:45 pm
Esprit IP Limited v. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 11:40 pm
Beer Pong shots c/o WikipediaA recent High Court decision (Breakthrough Funding v Nearby Media [2017] EWHC 2271 ch) follows on from an interim injunction which was granted by Arnold J earlier in the year. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 2:06 pm
Property Damage Appraisers Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 12:24 am
Garnett (Notre Dame Law School) has posted “Things That are Not Caesar’s”: The Story of Kedroff v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 3:18 am
Daniel Ryan Way and CMDW, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 4:27 am
In 2014, HMPO completed an internal review of gender marking in passports. [read post]
