Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 11,951
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2007, 8:02 am
Earlier this week, the qui tam case of United States ex. rel.Louanne Boothe v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:12 am
See Twombly, 550 U.S. at 563 ('[O]nce a claim has been stated adequately, it may be supported by showing any set of facts consistent with the allegations in the complaint.'); McZeal v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 12:21 pm
Bozeman v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:40 pm
Relying upon Grace v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 11:47 am
In 2013, a group of retailers sued the New York Attorney General in the case Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:27 pm
Prices of the original editions of a New Hope jumped up in price on eBay. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 10:00 pm
LLC. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 7:28 am
, LLC v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 12:12 am
Concerning the fourth factor, the Zervos and The Picasso Project do not compete, because of their different markets and significantly dissimilar prices. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 12:16 pm
Ass’n v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:10 pm
Marcus v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 7:09 am
ML Genius v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 2:47 pm
SUBTITLE: How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 12:01 am
They cited a recent decision, Pettiford v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 7:59 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 12:02 pm
Within a few days of each other, the Supreme Court of the United States and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had Apple v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 2:41 pm
Price v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 2:32 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 8:35 am
Price II, Judge.Representing Appellant Cross: Donna D. [read post]
