Search for: "State v. Settle"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 15,654
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2021, 12:02 pm
The ban was the subject of multiple lawsuits including Stone v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:59 am
Notwithstanding the Court's citation of Ashwander v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 4:13 pm
Pacific Shores Property Owners Association v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 9:53 am
During its next term, the United States Supreme Court will review the First Circuit Court of Appeals’s holding in Acheson Hotels, LLC v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 9:53 am
During its next term, the United States Supreme Court will review the First Circuit Court of Appeals’s holding in Acheson Hotels, LLC v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 9:53 am
During its next term, the United States Supreme Court will review the First Circuit Court of Appeals’s holding in Acheson Hotels, LLC v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 10:40 am
In Madireddy v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 4:41 am
The First Department found that the motion court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting a continuance so that intervenor-insurance company could present the videotaped deposition testimony of an out-of-state nonparty witness, in Shia v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 2:42 pm
Rebecca Meek-Horton v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 6:33 am
Apollo, 128 N.J. 250 (1992) and Pruder v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 9:55 am
In SEC v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
[FN1] It is well settled that, "[u]nder FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection" (Matter of Empire Ch. of Associated Bldrs. and Contractors, Inc. v New York State Dept. of Transportation, ___ AD3d ___, ___, 2022 NY Slip Op 06852, *1 [3d Dept 2022] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
[FN1] It is well settled that, "[u]nder FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection" (Matter of Empire Ch. of Associated Bldrs. and Contractors, Inc. v New York State Dept. of Transportation, ___ AD3d ___, ___, 2022 NY Slip Op 06852, *1 [3d Dept 2022] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 2:02 pm
I don't view Lincoln's arguments as dispositive, nor do I share the view of my friends Paul Finkelman and Laurence Tribe that the issue was settled in the case of "Grant v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 8:00 am
Here: In Lewis v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm
If imported to the United States, congressional review would freeze rulemaking for all but the most anodyne texts—even if it could circumvent the holding in INS v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 4:14 pm
FEHR V. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 2:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 1:06 pm
He also says that United States v. [read post]
