Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 14,811
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2023, 5:38 am
Jamshidi concludes that Iran has a strong claim that terrorism exceptions violate the customary international law rules governing state immunity. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 5:21 am
The Supreme Court’s Friday night decision to deny emergency relief to a Nevada church that challenged the state’s coronavirus restrictions generated strong reactions over the weekend. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 7:40 pm
But, for reasons summarized in my last post, the merits case against the plan is strong, bolstered by Biden v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:21 am
Every state. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:09 pm
Circuit heard oral arguments in this case, Mozilla v FCC. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 1:25 pm
SCOTUS granted cert today in Kentucky v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 3:30 am
Hoi Kong Professor Jeremy Waldron is perhaps the world’s most influential critic of what he calls “strong judicial review of legislation” (SJRL). [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 9:20 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 12:24 pm
The court held, based upon the 1985 Florida Supreme Court opinion in State v. [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 12:57 pm
This time, I look at PrimeSource Building Products, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:11 pm
” Rath v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 9:51 am
The court summarizes its holding: The People of the State of California have a strong and legitimate interest in combating human trafficking by all [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 12:00 pm
Strong v Bird (1874): Reassessing the RuleElizabeth Drummond14. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:52 am
Furthermore, the Court observed that there were strong public policy and practical reasons for addressing the issue of invalidity regardless of the outcome of the question of infringement. 508 U.S. at 102-01. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 2:40 pm
It begins by discussing the recent transformation in church-state jurisprudence through decisions like Burwell v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm
He too considered Bonnard v Perryman and Reynolds v Malocco, as well as the hugely-influential decision of Clarke J in Cogley v RTE [2005] 4 IR 79, [2005] IEHC 180 (8 June 2005). [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:11 pm
In federal court, the district judge concluded that presenting mental health evidence would have made a strong case for relief under Romero, but that AEDPA limited relief because the familiar two-part test of Strickland v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 4:42 am
Florida has a very strong policy in favor of support for minor children. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 5:32 am
” In Boatman v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:21 am
One month and one week after the appellate opinion was handed down in the Oracle v. [read post]