Search for: "U. S. v. Little" Results 1461 - 1480 of 1,525
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm by Steve Bainbridge
A shareholder’s ability to dispose of his stock is merely defined by the terms of the corporate contract, which in turn is provided by the firm’s organic documents and the state of incorporation’s corporate statute and common law. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
The Supreme Court’s Wetland Saga Continues July 13, 2023 | Monika U. [read post]
8 Dec 2024, 6:48 am by Bill Marler
  In the representative case of Pfeffer v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm by UChicagoLaw
  And we all know that, as Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote in Schenk v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 11:19 am by Patricia Hughes
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 11:36 am by Eric Goldman
Ultimately, I understand why the school districts joined the lawsuit–on the can’t hurt, might help theory that maybe they could get a little money for no additional work on their part. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:43 pm by Steve Vladeck
 Perhaps the most important impact of the NDAA, however, may be with respect to a question that has received comparatively little attention–namely, the effect of the laws of war on the Executive’s military detention authority. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm by Marty Lederman
 Perhaps the most important impact of the NDAA, however, may be with respect to a question that has received comparatively little attention–namely, the effect of the laws of war on the Executive’s military detention authority. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:58 am by Michael O'Hear
  It is obvious that the amendment, and the underlying FSA, respond to longstanding assertions by the Commission and many other expert commentators that there is little or no meaningful difference in the harm or dangerousness associated with crack and powder cocaine offenses. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 1:46 pm by Stephen Page
We also accept that “it isnot an essential precondition” that the applicant’s legal representatives willnot continue to act unless the cost [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 3:18 pm
Under your misguided and bizarre reading of the statue, if a magazine published a photo of a woman hitting her child, every singe citizen who saw the photo and didn't call authorities would be criminally liable, as would anyone who viewed a U-tube video of random kids playing unsafely. [read post]