Search for: "United States v. King" Results 1461 - 1480 of 2,661
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Eight months before the 2016 presidential election, the President of the United States nominated a respected jurist to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
[9] See, e.g., Geoffrey Sawer, Modern Federalism 1 –2 (1969); Ivo Duchacek, Comparative Federalism 207 –08 (1970); Preston King, Federalism and Federation 60 (! [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression 12 v. (1946-1948) Office of United States Chief of Counsel. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
’”  (Catholic Charities of Sacramento, 32 Cal. 4th 527, 565 (2004), quoting United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Peter Margulies
§1182(a)(9)(B)(v), Congress precluded judicial review of decisions by the attorney general to waive (or refuse to waive) a restriction on the admission of foreign nationals who had accrued periods of unlawful presence in the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Peter Margulies
§1182(a)(9)(B)(v), Congress precluded judicial review of decisions by the attorney general to waive (or refuse to waive) a restriction on the admission of foreign nationals who had accrued periods of unlawful presence in the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Peter Margulies
§1182(a)(9)(B)(v), Congress precluded judicial review of decisions by the attorney general to waive (or refuse to waive) a restriction on the admission of foreign nationals who had accrued periods of unlawful presence in the United States. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:30 am by Guest Blogger
You can reach her by e-mail at reva.siegel@yale.edu.Mary Ziegler is Martin Luther King Jr. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 11:33 am
United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914), the case that is generally understood as having introduced the exclusionary rule. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 1:19 pm by Aaron
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/10/19/08-99005.pdf United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:16 am by Guest Blogger
He calls the majority’s decision "indefensible," and describes the proceedings as following "a course more fitting a kangaroo court than a court of the United States. [read post]