Search for: "Chambers v. State" Results 1481 - 1500 of 4,896
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The Criminal Chamber of the Tribunal de Grande Instance of Ouagadougou found Mr Konaté and his contributor guilty of defamation, public insult, and insult to a magistrate under Burkina Faso’s Information Law and Penal Code. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 10:42 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
” Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights  The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights ruled in 2003 in Perna v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:22 pm by Gene Quinn
In March of 2006, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 2:00 pm
Any time an execution was scheduled in any of the states of the Ninth Circuit, the judge and his clerks would stay in chambers until the final moments in case there was a last-minute appeal. [read post]
26 May 2011, 1:25 pm by David Lat
– Chief Justice John Roberts, benchslapping the dissents by Justices Breyer and Sotomayor in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 11:47 am by Holly Johnston, Esq.
New York is now one of 16 states—and the first with a Republican-controlled chamber—supporting an amendment in response to the decision. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:25 am by John L. Welch
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.December 2, 2010 - 10 AM: The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 3:58 pm
Lameman (discussed here and here) stated as follows:The summary judgment rule serves an important purpose in the civil litigation system. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 11:43 pm by INFORRM
Glenn Mulcaire v News Group Newspapers The facts Mr Mulcaire was employed by NGN as a private investigator between 2002 and 2007. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 1:22 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
State, No. 100,852 (Nov. 6, 2009); Megan Herrington; affirming Judge Tatum's order granting movant permission to file late petition for review based on ineffective assistance of appellate counselState v. [read post]