Search for: "Christian v. State" Results 1481 - 1500 of 3,741
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Lucia v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
 From SSRN:Karsten Schubert, The Christian Roots of Critique. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:55 pm by Patricia Salkin
The blog is located at: http://www.rluipa-defense.com/home.cfm In American Atheists v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm by Eric Goldman
As a double-insult, 512(f) preempts related state law claims over abusive takedown notices, so it actually leaves victims worse off than if 512(f) didn’t exist by clearing out the field. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
In Part One, we laid out the larger First Amendment framework in which the dispute might be located and discussed how the Court’s language and reasoning in Hazelwood School District v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 1:11 am
By Christian Stegmaiercstegmaier@collinsandlacy.comA delivery person comes unto your retail or hospitality-related premises and is injured. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:41 am by Andrew Breidenbach
Michael Doyle of McClatchy Newspapers tells the “long-shot” story of United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 3:52 pm
Also, no documentary or testimonial evidence proved that appellant was a legally ordained minister or that he was recognized as a minister, pastor, preacher or missionary by any Christian denomination or sect. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
Thomas, United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:39 am by John Elwood
Judge, 10-367, and Quinn v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 12:41 am by Florence Plisner (Bristows)
On 8 October 2021, His Honour Judge Hacon (sitting as a Judge of the High Court) handed down his decision in an action brought by Royalty Pharma Collection Trust (“Royalty Pharma”) for approximately €23 million in royalty payments from Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH (“Boehringer”) (Royalty Pharma Collection Trust v Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH [2021] EWHC 2692 (Pat)). [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:26 am by The Legal Blog
They were working for the welfare of tribals in the state which was not liked by Sangh Parivar activists who were strongly opposed to the conversions of low caste Hindus and tribals to Christianity. [read post]