Search for: "Court v. State" Results 1481 - 1500 of 207,421
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2020, 6:04 am by MBettman
Thus, while evidence showing the defendant’s character or propensity to commit crimes or acts is forbidden, evidence of other acts is admissible … Continue reading → The post Merit Decision: Court Issues Primer on Evid.R. 404(B) (Part II) State v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:34 pm by Donna Eng
Just a head’s up to all the South Florida criminal defense attorneys who are following the hot topic of the constitutionality of Florida’s drug possession statute, section 893.13: the Florida Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the case of State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by Bryn Hines
Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 10:08 am
Regina (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “Ministerial power to detain an overstaying immigrant was limited only to the process of deportation; any detention under the immigration provisions would be subject to the control of the courts, principally by way of judicial review. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 7:49 am by Ben Allen
  Citing language from the obstruction of justice provision, USSG § 2J1.2, dicta in its prior decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 3:26 am by sally
Regina (Guardian News and Media Ltd) v City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court; Guardian News and Media Ltd v Government of the United States of America and another [2011] EWCA Civ 1188; [2011] WLR (D) 309 “The Court of Appeal had jurisdiction to hear a proposed appeal from a decision of a court conducting extradition proceedings (which were criminal in nature), where that decision related to a matter which was wholly collateral to the… [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 9:59 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion and Order in the following matter: OP 09-0610, 2009 MT 439, THE OFFICE OF THE STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER, Petitioner, v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 7:09 am
  The Court did so in Montejo v. [read post]