Search for: "Doe 35"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 17,228
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2016, 3:32 am
., are de facto functional - ed.] that does not mean that a particular design for a trigger guard is functional in a trademark sense [i.e., de jure functional]. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 5:16 am
Barony House Restaurant, LLC, 382 S.C. 35, 674 S.E.2d 500 (Ct. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 6:30 am
Damages accrue from the moment infringement of the issued patent commences, with a six year “statute of limitations” provided in 35 U.S.C. 286. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 10:00 pm
Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 10:00 pm
So how does Schein apply to intellectual property law? [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm
The starting point is the first patent statute, 35 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 2:35 pm
See 35 U. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 10:28 pm
Obviousness always requires more than a single reference,although that which is additional does not need to add an element or teaching found in the claims. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 4:39 pm
"35% Patricia Ambrose"I sign this on February 3, 2014. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 7:11 am
“In rejecting claims under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 8:55 am
Does everything but win. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 6:06 am
The PTAB also found the patent claims to be invalid in the CBM under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 10:39 am
If this does not happen, we can argue to have the charges dropped. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 9:18 am
A final difficulty for Hirshfeld is that his appointment has a 5-year tenure protection and can only be removed early for cause. 35 U.S.C. 4(b)(2). [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
"* See §35 of the Civil Service Law. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 9:52 am
But the Court does not see things this way. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
"* See §35 of the Civil Service Law. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 10:28 am
” Terry v Bayer Corp., 145 F.3d 28, 35-36 (1st Cir. 1998)(quoting Garren v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 6:37 am
The court held that the trial judge has 35 days to rule if the motion to disqualify is served by mail. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 9:10 am
”35 U.S.C. [read post]
