Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court" Results 1481 - 1500 of 7,776
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2020, 9:48 am by Patricia Hughes
The 2019 Quebec Superior Court decision in Truchon held that the foreseeability requirement in the Criminal Code and the parallel Quebec provision in that province’s End-of-Life Care Act are unconstitutional. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The court, citing Brogan v United States, 522 US 398, explained that "neither the text nor the spirit of the Fifth Amendment confers the privilege to lie. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 11:17 pm
 Then, in the 1960s, the Supreme Court awoke Section 1983 from hibernation - in Monroe v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
KBR argued that the award was contrary to US public policy (Article V(2)(b) of the New York convention permits a court to refuse recognition and enforcement on public policy grounds, as does Section 207 of the FAA). [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 9:49 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
The Court of Appeal for Ontario has just released its decision in Tucows.Com Co. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 11:59 am by Linda A. Kerns
Adams, 882 A.2d 496. (2005) A recent Pennsylvania Superior Court case, S.S. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:10 am
  The trial court’s decision was affirmed by the Appellate Division of New Jersey Superior Court. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 3:56 am
The court ruled that in the absence of specific language barring further action, an employer’s failure to act within the time frame contemplated in a collective bargaining agreement does not preclude further action by the employer.The Appellate Division, Second Department, agreed.In affirming the lower court’s ruling, the Appellate Division pointed out that in interpreting similar contractual provisions, the Second Department has repeatedly held that, in the… [read post]