Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 7,776
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2021, 11:33 am
This finding aligns with the 2018 Superior Court of California decision in Thurston v. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 7:53 am
Supreme Court held in Blakely v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 9:48 am
The 2019 Quebec Superior Court decision in Truchon held that the foreseeability requirement in the Criminal Code and the parallel Quebec provision in that province’s End-of-Life Care Act are unconstitutional. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 12:00 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Ledcor v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 7:00 am
The court, citing Brogan v United States, 522 US 398, explained that "neither the text nor the spirit of the Fifth Amendment confers the privilege to lie. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 6:42 am
” For the full motion to quash in Payward v. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 11:17 pm
Then, in the 1960s, the Supreme Court awoke Section 1983 from hibernation - in Monroe v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 2:47 pm
The United States Supreme Court in Batson v. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 7:07 am
However, as the Supreme Court explained in Rogers Communications Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
KBR argued that the award was contrary to US public policy (Article V(2)(b) of the New York convention permits a court to refuse recognition and enforcement on public policy grounds, as does Section 207 of the FAA). [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:31 am
The Court cites a case from 2001, Slattery v. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 9:49 am
The Court of Appeal for Ontario has just released its decision in Tucows.Com Co. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 11:59 am
Adams, 882 A.2d 496. (2005) A recent Pennsylvania Superior Court case, S.S. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:10 am
The trial court’s decision was affirmed by the Appellate Division of New Jersey Superior Court. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:37 am
The Court cited Wind Power Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:37 am
The Court cited Wind Power Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:37 am
The Court cited Wind Power Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:37 am
The Court cited Wind Power Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 3:56 am
The court ruled that in the absence of specific language barring further action, an employer’s failure to act within the time frame contemplated in a collective bargaining agreement does not preclude further action by the employer.The Appellate Division, Second Department, agreed.In affirming the lower court’s ruling, the Appellate Division pointed out that in interpreting similar contractual provisions, the Second Department has repeatedly held that, in the… [read post]